Tuesday, October 26, 2010
We are still involved in migrating our site. This applies to this blog as well. Blogger moved from blogger to blogspot, so we're updating our links.
Wednesday, August 04, 2010
We're back...finally!
Well, it's been a while since we posted, but the time hasn't been lost. Aside from delving deeper with some great tools (Captivate, AS3, and the CS5 premium suite in general), getting deeper into simulation approaches, some exciting quality techniques, we're really enjoying the incredible views since moving our office to Washington County!
Odds and Ends
Work with Fran and her crew on the APICS course Certified in Production and Inventory Management (CPIM) is going well. This course is a classroom certification course and includes such topics as "...optimizing inventory investment, delivering Just-in-Time products and services, streamlining operations through accurate forecasting, setting and achieving goals, managing all aspects of the supply chain, and maximizing return on investment for systems and technologies." Some very cool and useful material.
Fran's operations quality consult is also keeping her hopping - her client is realizing just how amazing she is as a project manager and team leader!
Finally migrated our site! You shouldn't notice a difference, but we now have mirrored the Scher Progression Site. You should see the same content at www.isdservices.com and www.scherprogression.com. We are using this as a starting point for consistent structure. Over the next few months, we'll start diverging the content and look, with the goal of giving our specialities of instructional design and quality engineering their unique focus.
Odds and Ends
Work with Fran and her crew on the APICS course Certified in Production and Inventory Management (CPIM) is going well. This course is a classroom certification course and includes such topics as "...optimizing inventory investment, delivering Just-in-Time products and services, streamlining operations through accurate forecasting, setting and achieving goals, managing all aspects of the supply chain, and maximizing return on investment for systems and technologies." Some very cool and useful material.
Fran's operations quality consult is also keeping her hopping - her client is realizing just how amazing she is as a project manager and team leader!
Finally migrated our site! You shouldn't notice a difference, but we now have mirrored the Scher Progression Site. You should see the same content at www.isdservices.com and www.scherprogression.com. We are using this as a starting point for consistent structure. Over the next few months, we'll start diverging the content and look, with the goal of giving our specialities of instructional design and quality engineering their unique focus.
Friday, March 19, 2010
This blog has moved
This blog is now located at http://scherprogression.blogspot.com/.
You will be automatically redirected in 30 seconds, or you may click here.
For feed subscribers, please update your feed subscriptions to
http://scherprogression.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default.
Captivate 4: Simulation Actions Lessons Learned
Deleting Variables and Advanced Actions
Recently, while debugging a simulation demo, I found myself in a bit of a Catch 22. Here's the situation. After finding a flaw in logic, I decided it would be easier to completely delete the offending routine in the Advanced Actions submenu.
Choosing Project -->Actions-->Advanced actions-->Delete brought a dialog box saying the action was in use (and couldn't be deleted). The same thing occurred when I chose to delete a variable. Captivate thoughtfully provides a Usage button to show where the variables and actions are used. Unfortunately, or fortunately, depending on your view, you can't just go back to the root location in the list to remove things. Adobe is protecting you from yourself (Thanks to the Blues Brothers movie, I hear Aretha Franklin singing "You better think about what you're trying to do...!").
There may be a better way, but one solution I found is to go to each frame (refer to the Usage button list, Project-->Actions-->Advanced actions) where the code or variable is used. Right click on the object using the code, such as a button or text field, and then change the action to some other choice (and replace with a new advanced action later). I chose "Continue." Once all references to the name of the action are removed, Now Captivate will allow you to delete the action. Lesson learned!
Recently, while debugging a simulation demo, I found myself in a bit of a Catch 22. Here's the situation. After finding a flaw in logic, I decided it would be easier to completely delete the offending routine in the Advanced Actions submenu.
Choosing Project -->Actions-->Advanced actions-->Delete brought a dialog box saying the action was in use (and couldn't be deleted). The same thing occurred when I chose to delete a variable. Captivate thoughtfully provides a Usage button to show where the variables and actions are used. Unfortunately, or fortunately, depending on your view, you can't just go back to the root location in the list to remove things. Adobe is protecting you from yourself (Thanks to the Blues Brothers movie, I hear Aretha Franklin singing "You better think about what you're trying to do...!").
There may be a better way, but one solution I found is to go to each frame (refer to the Usage button list, Project-->Actions-->Advanced actions) where the code or variable is used. Right click on the object using the code, such as a button or text field, and then change the action to some other choice (and replace with a new advanced action later). I chose "Continue." Once all references to the name of the action are removed, Now Captivate will allow you to delete the action. Lesson learned!
Labels: advanced action, captivate, code, simulation
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
2009 Time to Take a Breath
Whew, the year is coming to an end and it's time to prepare for that Arthur C. Clark icon, 2010. Here's a quick summary of what we've been up to at Scher Progression LLC.
Fran coordinated, and developed with, her subcontractor and cadre of subject matter experts a huge certification quality course called CPIM (Certification in Production and Inventory Management). This is part of a series that will continue through 2010.
Also, she has been adding to our Quality-related consulting activity with FDA documenation work for a German-owned biotech company.
We worked together developing a course called BIM Technology (Building Information Model), which gets into state of the art construction modeling for 3D,4D, and 5D virtual buildings. Earlier in the year, we completed several projects for this same client, including an education needs analysis survey and the presentation of an education/instructional design trends workshop, that served as a team building program in its method.
I developed a course with the rather imposing title, Quality Assurance Specification Development and Validation for the Austin-based arm of a Dutch multi-national geotechnical company. We're trying to think globally and act locally.
Finally, I did a brief presentation for an Adobe User Group about some of our Captivate work.
It's not been all work, though. Fran traveled for her client to Toronto, (and I just had to tag along), and we visited some of our old Canadian haunts. Obviously, there was a lot of change since we lived there in the 1980’s, but it was really cool to revisit (I even got to meet some the Maple Leaf players!).
To our friends and clients (same thing, but redundancy is a wonderful thing), Fran and I wish you and your families a good end of the year and a healthy, safe, and prosperous new year.
Monday, July 13, 2009
Reflective Learning References
Just a couple of quick references behind one of the learning approaches we like to use, the concept of reflection. Hopefully, it stimulates higher level learning. We want learners to consider the content, ideas, approaches, and processes and relate it to what they already know, possibly, how they presently do things on the job. Ideally, They'll consider what they would change when they return to their offices i.e, change their behaviors. This after all is the point of teaching and training.
Sometimes it's as simple as asking learners how they currently do things and then showing more efficient improvements and asking for the implications it has for their work. At the other end, we might allow time for learners to begin an action plan that might help them "hit the ground" running back on the job.
So here are a few citings behind this method, before I forget: Morgan and Saxon, 1991; Van Ments, 1990 concluded that the act of reflection could develop deeper meaning from what originally seemed more superficial learning. They found that this approach requires careful questioning that stimulates learners to relate to what they already know. Mezirow, 1990 stated how important reflection is to "transformative learning."
An interesting Aspect
In her book, Reflection in Learning & Professional Development, Theory and Practice, Jennifer A. Moon discusses the compulsion of teachers, particularly in higher education, to supply more "packaged" material as references and resources, and even computer programs. The teachers in effect "tidy up" the learning. This can reduce reflection and negatively affect learning. The book references many studies including those above.
Van Ments, M. (1989), The Effective Use of Role Play,
Morgan, N and Saxon S (1991) Teaching Questioning and Learning (London: Routledge)
Improving learning through reflection, Karen Hinett
Sometimes it's as simple as asking learners how they currently do things and then showing more efficient improvements and asking for the implications it has for their work. At the other end, we might allow time for learners to begin an action plan that might help them "hit the ground" running back on the job.
So here are a few citings behind this method, before I forget: Morgan and Saxon, 1991; Van Ments, 1990 concluded that the act of reflection could develop deeper meaning from what originally seemed more superficial learning. They found that this approach requires careful questioning that stimulates learners to relate to what they already know. Mezirow, 1990 stated how important reflection is to "transformative learning."
An interesting Aspect
In her book, Reflection in Learning & Professional Development, Theory and Practice, Jennifer A. Moon discusses the compulsion of teachers, particularly in higher education, to supply more "packaged" material as references and resources, and even computer programs. The teachers in effect "tidy up" the learning. This can reduce reflection and negatively affect learning. The book references many studies including those above.
Van Ments, M. (1989), The Effective Use of Role Play,
Morgan, N and Saxon S (1991) Teaching Questioning and Learning (London: Routledge)
Improving learning through reflection, Karen Hinett
Friday, June 19, 2009
What's Going On!
Here's a quick update about some of our recent activities:
Fran is working hard on managing the update of five CPIM certification prep courses for APICS, the Association for Operations Management (CPIM is short for Certified in Production and Inventory Management). This is a major certification in the operations industry. She is working closely with a group of subject matter experts who are writing and reviewing the content. Fran’s role is to manage the project, coordinate the instructional design, compose graphics, and ensure product quality. Last week, she brought together, online, a number of subject matter experts from around the country to review the outline for the new Strategic Management of Resources course (the capstone course for the series). The SMEs were pleased with the concept of including more case studies and interactions she has planned. This project will run through September of this year.
Currently, I am designing a quality assurance course. It appears that we may beat our completion deadline by about three months! (We'll provide a more formal project description later when we have the client's permission.) We can say that this one has seven modules that include material about a state of the art QA simulation application, a very nice real world case study that brings together all of the course content, and some great back-on-the-job implementation aids.
We just heard that the FHWA (Federal Highways Administration) is planning to host a the effective communications course we adapted for online presentation. This is a nice blend of Web conference training (real-time instructor facilitated online) and Web-based training (online self-study). It's an exciting program with real-world and proven applied techniques that culminates in a fun role play with online breakout groups.
Fran is working hard on managing the update of five CPIM certification prep courses for APICS, the Association for Operations Management (CPIM is short for Certified in Production and Inventory Management). This is a major certification in the operations industry. She is working closely with a group of subject matter experts who are writing and reviewing the content. Fran’s role is to manage the project, coordinate the instructional design, compose graphics, and ensure product quality. Last week, she brought together, online, a number of subject matter experts from around the country to review the outline for the new Strategic Management of Resources course (the capstone course for the series). The SMEs were pleased with the concept of including more case studies and interactions she has planned. This project will run through September of this year.
Currently, I am designing a quality assurance course. It appears that we may beat our completion deadline by about three months! (We'll provide a more formal project description later when we have the client's permission.) We can say that this one has seven modules that include material about a state of the art QA simulation application, a very nice real world case study that brings together all of the course content, and some great back-on-the-job implementation aids.
We just heard that the FHWA (Federal Highways Administration) is planning to host a the effective communications course we adapted for online presentation. This is a nice blend of Web conference training (real-time instructor facilitated online) and Web-based training (online self-study). It's an exciting program with real-world and proven applied techniques that culminates in a fun role play with online breakout groups.
Thursday, February 26, 2009
Baking Bread? Designing for Slackers
Welcome to an episode of ISD-Guy. When we last caught up with our intrepid designer he was trekking through the Mudumalai forest. Luckily, he stopped by our office, so we didn't have to renew our passport.
ISD-Guy, a learned colleague writes:
My Learning 2.0-type class isn't getting the results needed. I read the traffic logs and see that only a few in our class visit the linked resources, no one offers any blog postings, let alone responses, during our synchronous sessions, the same people participate in the chat pods, and collaborative projects are done by the usual gunghoers while the rest of the team members merrily collect their continuing education credit. I've tried discussing the issues, talking to their bosses, as well as other teaching-tactics to no avail. Help!!!
Lost in Virtual Space
***
Dear LVS,
You've got a case of the social loafers, and I'm not talking about bread makers. You are now finding out that if you build it, they won't necessarily come. Another way to put it is "you can't lead a horse to water."
Set up your Way Back machine and visit the good ol' Journal of Personality and Psychology in 1979, look for a great research paper called Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing by Bibb Latenae, Kipling Williams, and Stephen Harkins.
LVS, basically, this means that if you have a group, some of the people will slack off. There are design variables you can tinker with to decrease loafing. The amount of structure in a social learning context is under debate, but it's always a good idea to pay attention to human behavior and look for tendencies. It's good practice to focus on the fruits of performance (products) on the job, but when it comes to learning put a magnifying glass on individual performance--design it in! For that matter, isn't it good management to do this on the job, too? Design the group project with defined roles and responsibilities (the group's required project output is usually not as defined; the group decides on the specifics).
Click here for the reference and detail. We'll try and discuss this in more detail and provide a wiki link when it's up.
ISD-Guy, a learned colleague writes:
My Learning 2.0-type class isn't getting the results needed. I read the traffic logs and see that only a few in our class visit the linked resources, no one offers any blog postings, let alone responses, during our synchronous sessions, the same people participate in the chat pods, and collaborative projects are done by the usual gunghoers while the rest of the team members merrily collect their continuing education credit. I've tried discussing the issues, talking to their bosses, as well as other teaching-tactics to no avail. Help!!!
Lost in Virtual Space
***
Dear LVS,
You've got a case of the social loafers, and I'm not talking about bread makers. You are now finding out that if you build it, they won't necessarily come. Another way to put it is "you can't lead a horse to water."
Set up your Way Back machine and visit the good ol' Journal of Personality and Psychology in 1979, look for a great research paper called Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing by Bibb Latenae, Kipling Williams, and Stephen Harkins.
LVS, basically, this means that if you have a group, some of the people will slack off. There are design variables you can tinker with to decrease loafing. The amount of structure in a social learning context is under debate, but it's always a good idea to pay attention to human behavior and look for tendencies. It's good practice to focus on the fruits of performance (products) on the job, but when it comes to learning put a magnifying glass on individual performance--design it in! For that matter, isn't it good management to do this on the job, too? Design the group project with defined roles and responsibilities (the group's required project output is usually not as defined; the group decides on the specifics).
Click here for the reference and detail. We'll try and discuss this in more detail and provide a wiki link when it's up.